STATE BALLOT QUESTIONS
There will be no statewide questions 1–5 on the 2026 General Election ballot. There were a number of ballot initiatives circulated, but none of them gained enough valid signatures to qualify for the general election ballot.
Statewide Question 6 and Question 7 will be on the General Election ballot for the second time. Both ballot questions passed during the 2024 General Election and must be voted on for a second time. If they pass again during the 2026 General Election, they will amend the Nevada Constitution. The following pages include information about each ballot measure, including the arguments “for” and “against.”
STATE QUESTION NO. 6
Amendment to the Nevada Constitution
Initiative Petition C-05-2023
CONDENSATION (Ballot Question)
Should the Nevada Constitution be amended to create an individual’s fundamental right to an abortion, without interference by state or local governments, whenever the abortion is performed by a qualified healthcare professional until fetal viability or when necessary to protect the health or life of the pregnant individual at any point during the pregnancy?
Yes ☐ No ☐
EXPLANATION & DIGEST
EXPLANATION
This initiative, if approved by the voters, amends the Nevada Constitution to create a constitutional right to abortion.
This right to abortion would apply from the start of a person’s pregnancy up until the start of “fetal viability,” unless the pregnant person needs medical care to protect that person’s life or health, in which case the right applies throughout the pregnancy. “Fetal viability” means “the point in pregnancy when, in the professional judgment of the patient's treating health care practitioner, there is a significant likelihood of the fetus’ sustained survival outside the uterus without the application of extraordinary medical measures.”
The initiative makes clear that the State of Nevada, including county and city governments in Nevada, generally cannot interfere with this right. But a state, county, or city government can interfere with the right if there is a “compelling state interest” in doing so. A “compelling state interest” exists only if the government uses the least restrictive means to protect or improve the pregnant person’s life or health in ways that follow clinical standards of practice.
Lastly, this proposed right to abortion does not require or force any individual in Nevada to have an abortion. Instead, it creates a right that allows an individual to make their own decision.
A “Yes” vote would create a new section of the Nevada Constitution to establish a person’s constitutional right to abortion, so that a person can make decisions about matters relating to abortion and reproductive healthcare, without interference from state or local governments.
A “No” vote would keep the Nevada Constitution in its current form and would not impact the availability of abortion as a statutory right under Nevada law.
DIGEST
Existing law states that abortions are legal in Nevada and must occur within 24 weeks after the start of the pregnancy. An exception currently exists to allow an abortion after 24 weeks if a physician reasonably believes that an abortion is necessary to preserve the pregnant person’s life or health. Existing law also requires that abortions performed after the 24th week of pregnancy be performed in a hospital licensed by the State of Nevada.
If approved by the voters, this ballot measure would add a new section to Article 1 of the Nevada Constitution with the following information.
Section 1 of this amendment to the Nevada Constitution would create a “fundamental right to abortion.” This means that the Nevada Constitution would make abortion a legal option for all individuals, not just Nevadans, that is protected by the Nevada Constitution. The proposed amendment also includes the right to have an abortion procedure done by a qualified healthcare professional.
The amendment proposes that the right to an abortion would extend until “fetal viability, or when needed to protect the life or health of the pregnant patient.” “Fetal viability” means “the point in pregnancy when, in the professional judgment of the patient's treating health care practitioner, there is a significant likelihood of the fetus’ sustained survival outside the uterus without the application of extraordinary medical measures.”
If the abortion would be necessary to protect the pregnant person’s life or health, the proposed amendment allows an abortion procedure to be carried out after the start of fetal viability.
The proposed amendment would also generally prevent the State of Nevada or any of its political subdivisions (e.g., the Nevada Legislature, county and city governments) from interfering with the constitutional right to abortion. State and local governments can interfere with this right only if they have a “compelling state interest” in doing so. A “compelling state interest” exists only if the government uses the least restrictive means to protect or improve the pregnant person’s life or health in ways that follow clinical standards of practice.
Section 2 of the proposed constitutional amendment states that if any part of the amendment is challenged in court, then the rest of the amendment is not affected and remains in force. This section ensures that the right to abortion is protected to the greatest extent possible in the event of future lawsuits.